Category:Assessment - Revision history

Bjoern at 10:19, 1 October 2012

2012-10-01T10:19:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:19, 1 October 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~:Teaching Approaches~~/~~Assessment}}~~		{{CategoryText/Teaching_Approaches}}

	~~{{tag\|Pedagogical Strategies~~}}

SimonKnight: Replaced content with "{{:Teaching Approaches/Assessment}} {{tag|Pedagogical Strategies}}"

2012-08-23T09:07:59Z

Replaced content with "{{:Teaching Approaches/Assessment}} {{tag|Pedagogical Strategies}}"

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:07, 23 August 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Assessment may take many forms, including whole class, and individual. Readers should consider reading the pages on these approaches in addition to the guidance given below. Where appropriate links have been incorporated - if you are a wiki-contributor, please do add further internal links, and if of high quality, external too.		{{:Teaching Approaches/Assessment}}

	~~== The Typical Structure of Dialogue ==~~
	{{~~adaptedfrom::The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|IRF\|A striking insight provided by classroom research is that much talk between teachers and their pupils has the following pattern~~: ~~a teacher's question, a pupil's response, and then an evaluative comment by the teacher. This is described as an Initiation-Response-Feedback exchange, or IRF. Here's an example<br~~ />

	~~:'''I''' Teacher - What's the capital city of Argentina?~~
	~~:'''R''' Pupil - Buenos Aires~~
	~~:'''F''' Teacher - Yes, well done~~

	~~This pattern was first pointed out in the 1970s by the British researchers Sinclair and Coulthard. Their original research was reported in~~
	~~:Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, M. (1975) ''Towards an Analysis of Discourse: the English used by Teachers and Pupils.'' London: Oxford University Press.~~

	Sinclair and Coulthard's research has been the basis for extended debates about whether or not teachers should ask so many questions to which they already know the answer; and further debate about the range of uses and purposes of IRF in working classrooms. Despite all this, it seems that many teachers (even those who have qualified in recent decades) have not heard of it. Is this because their training did not include any examination of the structures of classroom talk – or because even if it did, the practical value of such an examination was not made clear?

	A teacher's professional development (and, indeed, the development of members of any profession) should involve the gaining of critical insights into professional practice – to learn to see behind the ordinary, the taken for granted, and to question the effectiveness of what is normally done. Recognizing the inherent structure of teacher-pupil talk is a valuable step in that direction. Student teachers need to see how they almost inevitably converge on other teachers' style and generate the conventional patterns of classroom talk. By noting this, they can begin to consider what effects this has on pupil participation in class. There is nothing wrong with the use of IRFs by teachers, but question-and-answer routines can be used both productively and unproductively. By understanding and questioning what generally happens, students can begin to construct the kind of dialogues that they can feel confident have most educational value.}}

	~~== The Importance of Identifying High Quality Talk ==~~
	~~{{adaptedfrom::The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|~~Assessment\|A main concern for assessment is to consider how well the talk suits the kind of event in which children are participating. Criteria are likely to be different, depending on whether they are talking in a group, making a presentation to the class, engaged in a drama-related activity, discussing ideas in citizenship, and so on. Helping any child improve their current competence requires some sort of assessment. Talk is difficult to assess because it is context dependent and ephemeral, but good opportunities for assessment occur regularly, especially in 'talk-focused' classrooms where both teacher and children are aware of the importance of speaking and listening for learning. This is the situation students need to be able to both recognise and create.

	There are of course some aspects of evaluating children's talk where great sensitivity is needed. The ways people talk can be closely related to their identities, and student teachers may rightly worry about making evaluations of some aspects of a child's way of speaking such as their accent. Student teachers will need to appreciate the distinction between on the one hand using an assessment to help a child to become more involved in learning conversations, or to develop their presentation skills, and on the other trying to alter a child's accent or to ban the use of dialect in the classroom simply because it 'sounds wrong'.}}

	{{tag\|Pedagogical Strategies}}		{{tag\|Pedagogical Strategies}}

SimonKnight at 09:05, 23 August 2012

2012-08-23T09:05:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:05, 23 August 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:

	== The Typical Structure of Dialogue ==		== The Typical Structure of Dialogue ==
	{{adaptedfrom:The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|IRF\|A striking insight provided by classroom research is that much talk between teachers and their pupils has the following pattern: a teacher's question, a pupil's response, and then an evaluative comment by the teacher. This is described as an Initiation-Response-Feedback exchange, or IRF. Here's an example<br />		{{adaptedfrom::The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|IRF\|A striking insight provided by classroom research is that much talk between teachers and their pupils has the following pattern: a teacher's question, a pupil's response, and then an evaluative comment by the teacher. This is described as an Initiation-Response-Feedback exchange, or IRF. Here's an example<br />

	:'''I''' Teacher - What's the capital city of Argentina?		:'''I''' Teacher - What's the capital city of Argentina?
Line 16:		Line 16:

	== The Importance of Identifying High Quality Talk ==		== The Importance of Identifying High Quality Talk ==
	{{adaptedfrom:The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|Assessment\|		{{adaptedfrom::The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|Assessment\|A main concern for assessment is to consider how well the talk suits the kind of event in which children are participating. Criteria are likely to be different, depending on whether they are talking in a group, making a presentation to the class, engaged in a drama-related activity, discussing ideas in citizenship, and so on. Helping any child improve their current competence requires some sort of assessment. Talk is difficult to assess because it is context dependent and ephemeral, but good opportunities for assessment occur regularly, especially in 'talk-focused' classrooms where both teacher and children are aware of the importance of speaking and listening for learning. This is the situation students need to be able to both recognise and create.
	A main concern for assessment is to consider how well the talk suits the kind of event in which children are participating. Criteria are likely to be different, depending on whether they are talking in a group, making a presentation to the class, engaged in a drama-related activity, discussing ideas in citizenship, and so on. Helping any child improve their current competence requires some sort of assessment. Talk is difficult to assess because it is context dependent and ephemeral, but good opportunities for assessment occur regularly, especially in 'talk-focused' classrooms where both teacher and children are aware of the importance of speaking and listening for learning. This is the situation students need to be able to both recognise and create.

	There are of course some aspects of evaluating children's talk where great sensitivity is needed. The ways people talk can be closely related to their identities, and student teachers may rightly worry about making evaluations of some aspects of a child's way of speaking such as their accent. Student teachers will need to appreciate the distinction between on the one hand using an assessment to help a child to become more involved in learning conversations, or to develop their presentation skills, and on the other trying to alter a child's accent or to ban the use of dialect in the classroom simply because it 'sounds wrong'. }}		There are of course some aspects of evaluating children's talk where great sensitivity is needed. The ways people talk can be closely related to their identities, and student teachers may rightly worry about making evaluations of some aspects of a child's way of speaking such as their accent. Student teachers will need to appreciate the distinction between on the one hand using an assessment to help a child to become more involved in learning conversations, or to develop their presentation skills, and on the other trying to alter a child's accent or to ban the use of dialect in the classroom simply because it 'sounds wrong'.}}

	{{tag\|Pedagogical Strategies}}		{{tag\|Pedagogical Strategies}}

SimonKnight at 09:04, 23 August 2012

2012-08-23T09:04:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:04, 23 August 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:

	== The Typical Structure of Dialogue ==		== The Typical Structure of Dialogue ==
	{{~~#lst~~:The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|IRF}}		{{adaptedfrom:The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|IRF\|A striking insight provided by classroom research is that much talk between teachers and their pupils has the following pattern: a teacher's question, a pupil's response, and then an evaluative comment by the teacher. This is described as an Initiation-Response-Feedback exchange, or IRF. Here's an example<br />

			:'''I''' Teacher - What's the capital city of Argentina?
			:'''R''' Pupil - Buenos Aires
			:'''F''' Teacher - Yes, well done

			This pattern was first pointed out in the 1970s by the British researchers Sinclair and Coulthard. Their original research was reported in
			:Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, M. (1975) ''Towards an Analysis of Discourse: the English used by Teachers and Pupils.'' London: Oxford University Press.

			Sinclair and Coulthard's research has been the basis for extended debates about whether or not teachers should ask so many questions to which they already know the answer; and further debate about the range of uses and purposes of IRF in working classrooms. Despite all this, it seems that many teachers (even those who have qualified in recent decades) have not heard of it. Is this because their training did not include any examination of the structures of classroom talk – or because even if it did, the practical value of such an examination was not made clear?

			A teacher's professional development (and, indeed, the development of members of any profession) should involve the gaining of critical insights into professional practice – to learn to see behind the ordinary, the taken for granted, and to question the effectiveness of what is normally done. Recognizing the inherent structure of teacher-pupil talk is a valuable step in that direction. Student teachers need to see how they almost inevitably converge on other teachers' style and generate the conventional patterns of classroom talk. By noting this, they can begin to consider what effects this has on pupil participation in class. There is nothing wrong with the use of IRFs by teachers, but question-and-answer routines can be used both productively and unproductively. By understanding and questioning what generally happens, students can begin to construct the kind of dialogues that they can feel confident have most educational value.}}

	== The Importance of Identifying High Quality Talk ==		== The Importance of Identifying High Quality Talk ==
	{{~~#lst~~:The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|Assessment}}		{{adaptedfrom:The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|Assessment\|
			A main concern for assessment is to consider how well the talk suits the kind of event in which children are participating. Criteria are likely to be different, depending on whether they are talking in a group, making a presentation to the class, engaged in a drama-related activity, discussing ideas in citizenship, and so on. Helping any child improve their current competence requires some sort of assessment. Talk is difficult to assess because it is context dependent and ephemeral, but good opportunities for assessment occur regularly, especially in 'talk-focused' classrooms where both teacher and children are aware of the importance of speaking and listening for learning. This is the situation students need to be able to both recognise and create.

			There are of course some aspects of evaluating children's talk where great sensitivity is needed. The ways people talk can be closely related to their identities, and student teachers may rightly worry about making evaluations of some aspects of a child's way of speaking such as their accent. Student teachers will need to appreciate the distinction between on the one hand using an assessment to help a child to become more involved in learning conversations, or to develop their presentation skills, and on the other trying to alter a child's accent or to ban the use of dialect in the classroom simply because it 'sounds wrong'. }}

	{{tag\|Pedagogical Strategies}}		{{tag\|Pedagogical Strategies}}

SimonKnight at 15:59, 22 August 2012

2012-08-22T15:59:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:59, 22 August 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:
	{{#lst:The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|IRF}}		{{#lst:The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|IRF}}

	== The Importance of Identifying High Quality Talk ==#		== The Importance of Identifying High Quality Talk ==
	{{#lst:The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|Assessment}}		{{#lst:The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|Assessment}}

	{{tag\|Pedagogical Strategies}}		{{tag\|Pedagogical Strategies}}

SimonKnight at 15:59, 22 August 2012

2012-08-22T15:59:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:59, 22 August 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:

	== The Typical Structure of Dialogue ==		== The Typical Structure of Dialogue ==
	~~{{:The_Importance_of_Speaking_and_Listening\|transcludesection=IRF}}~~		{{#lst:The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|IRF}}
	{{#lst~~:The_Importance_of_Speaking_and_Listening\|IRF}}~~

	~~== The Importance of Identifying High Quality Talk ==~~
	{{:The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|~~transcludesection=Assessment~~}}

			== The Importance of Identifying High Quality Talk ==#
			{{#lst:The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|Assessment}}

	{{tag\|Pedagogical Strategies}}		{{tag\|Pedagogical Strategies}}

SimonKnight at 15:51, 22 August 2012

2012-08-22T15:51:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 22 August 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	== The Typical Structure of Dialogue ==		== The Typical Structure of Dialogue ==
	{{:The_Importance_of_Speaking_and_Listening\|transcludesection=IRF}}		{{:The_Importance_of_Speaking_and_Listening\|transcludesection=IRF}}
	{{#lst:~~The Importance of Speaking and Listening~~\|IRF}}		{{#lst:The_Importance_of_Speaking_and_Listening\|IRF}}

	== The Importance of Identifying High Quality Talk ==		== The Importance of Identifying High Quality Talk ==

SimonKnight at 15:51, 22 August 2012

2012-08-22T15:51:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 22 August 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:

	== The Typical Structure of Dialogue ==		== The Typical Structure of Dialogue ==
	{{:~~The Importance of Speaking and Listening~~\|transcludesection=IRF}}		{{:The_Importance_of_Speaking_and_Listening\|transcludesection=IRF}}
	{{#lst:The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|IRF}}		{{#lst:The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|IRF}}

SimonKnight at 13:17, 22 August 2012

2012-08-22T13:17:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:17, 22 August 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	== The Typical Structure of Dialogue ==		== The Typical Structure of Dialogue ==
	{{:The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|transcludesection=IRF}}		{{:The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|transcludesection=IRF}}
	{{#lst::The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|IRF}}		{{#lst:The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|IRF}}

	== The Importance of Identifying High Quality Talk ==		== The Importance of Identifying High Quality Talk ==

SimonKnight at 13:17, 22 August 2012

2012-08-22T13:17:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:17, 22 August 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	== The Typical Structure of Dialogue ==		== The Typical Structure of Dialogue ==
	{{:The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|transcludesection=IRF}}		{{:The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|transcludesection=IRF}}
	{{#lst:The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|IRF}}		{{#lst::The Importance of Speaking and Listening\|IRF}}

	== The Importance of Identifying High Quality Talk ==		== The Importance of Identifying High Quality Talk ==