Teaching Approaches/Questioning - Revision history

SimonKnight at 15:16, 20 September 2012

2012-09-20T15:16:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:16, 20 September 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{teaching approach header}}

	=Introduction=		=Introduction=
	{{adaptedfrom\|Types Of Question\|Intro\|The interaction between teacher and learners is the most important feature of the classroom. Whether helping learners to acquire basic skills or a better understanding to solve problems, or to engage in higher-order thinking such as evaluation, questions are crucial. Of course, questions may be asked by pupils as well as teachers: they are essential tools for both teaching and learning.		{{adaptedfrom\|Types Of Question\|Intro\|The interaction between teacher and learners is the most important feature of the classroom. Whether helping learners to acquire basic skills or a better understanding to solve problems, or to engage in higher-order thinking such as evaluation, questions are crucial. Of course, questions may be asked by pupils as well as teachers: they are essential tools for both teaching and learning.
Line 103:		Line 105:

	{{:Types Of Question/Table}}}}		{{:Types Of Question/Table}}}}

			{{teaching approach footer}}

SimonKnight: /* Why Question? */

2012-08-31T16:57:33Z

Why Question?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 31 August 2012
Line 25:		Line 25:
	On the other hand, if you want to help pupils develop higher-order thinking skills, you will need to ask more open questions that allow pupils to give a variety of acceptable responses. During class discussions and debriefings, it is useful to ask open questions, for example ‘Which of these four sources were most useful in helping with this enquiry?’, ‘Given all the conflicting arguments, where would you build the new superstore?’, ‘What do you think might affect the size of the current in this circuit?’		On the other hand, if you want to help pupils develop higher-order thinking skills, you will need to ask more open questions that allow pupils to give a variety of acceptable responses. During class discussions and debriefings, it is useful to ask open questions, for example ‘Which of these four sources were most useful in helping with this enquiry?’, ‘Given all the conflicting arguments, where would you build the new superstore?’, ‘What do you think might affect the size of the current in this circuit?’

	Questioning is sometimes used to bring a pupil’s attention back to the task in hand, for example ‘What do you think about that, Peter?’ or ‘Do you agree?’		Questioning is sometimes used to bring a pupil’s attention back to the task in hand, for example ‘What do you think about that, Peter?’ or ‘Do you agree?’}}

	== A Common Classroom Sequence ==		== A Common Classroom Sequence ==

SimonKnight at 12:13, 23 August 2012

2012-08-23T12:13:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:13, 23 August 2012
Line 91:		Line 91:
	Bloom researched thousands of questions routinely asked by teachers and categorised them. His research, and that of others, suggests that most learning- focused questions asked in classrooms fall into the first two categories, with few questions falling into the other categories which relate to higher-order thinking skills.}}		Bloom researched thousands of questions routinely asked by teachers and categorised them. His research, and that of others, suggests that most learning- focused questions asked in classrooms fall into the first two categories, with few questions falling into the other categories which relate to higher-order thinking skills.}}

			=Practical Advice=
	{{adaptedfrom\|Types Of Question\|How\|'''The practice of questioning'''		{{adaptedfrom\|Types Of Question\|How\|'''The practice of questioning'''

SimonKnight at 12:12, 23 August 2012

2012-08-23T12:12:40Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == A Common Classroom Sequence ==
 {{adaptedfrom|The Importance of Speaking and Listening|IRF|A striking insight provided by classroom research is that much talk between teachers and their pupils has the following pattern: a teacher's question, a pupil's response, and then an evaluative comment by the teacher. This is described as an Initiation-Response-Feedback exchange, or IRF. Here's an example<br />
@@ Line 15: / Line 43: @@
 =Summary of research=
 {{adaptedfrom|Questioning Research Summary|Body|'''Effective questioning'''
 Research evidence suggests that effective teachers use a greater number of open questions than less effective teachers. The mix of open and closed questions will, of course, depend on what is being taught and the objectives of the lesson. However, teachers who ask no open questions in a lesson may be providing insufficient cognitive challenges for pupils.
@@ Line 63: / Line 90: @@
 Bloom researched thousands of questions routinely asked by teachers and categorised them. His research, and that of others, suggests that most learning- focused questions asked in classrooms fall into the first two categories, with few questions falling into the other categories which relate to higher-order thinking skills.}}

SimonKnight at 11:24, 23 August 2012

2012-08-23T11:24:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:24, 23 August 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:
	A teacher's professional development (and, indeed, the development of members of any profession) should involve the gaining of critical insights into professional practice – to learn to see behind the ordinary, the taken for granted, and to question the effectiveness of what is normally done. Recognizing the inherent structure of teacher-pupil talk is a valuable step in that direction. Student teachers need to see how they almost inevitably converge on other teachers' style and generate the conventional patterns of classroom talk. By noting this, they can begin to consider what effects this has on pupil participation in class. There is nothing wrong with the use of IRFs by teachers, but question-and-answer routines can be used both productively and unproductively. By understanding and questioning what generally happens, students can begin to construct the kind of dialogues that they can feel confident have most educational value.}}		A teacher's professional development (and, indeed, the development of members of any profession) should involve the gaining of critical insights into professional practice – to learn to see behind the ordinary, the taken for granted, and to question the effectiveness of what is normally done. Recognizing the inherent structure of teacher-pupil talk is a valuable step in that direction. Student teachers need to see how they almost inevitably converge on other teachers' style and generate the conventional patterns of classroom talk. By noting this, they can begin to consider what effects this has on pupil participation in class. There is nothing wrong with the use of IRFs by teachers, but question-and-answer routines can be used both productively and unproductively. By understanding and questioning what generally happens, students can begin to construct the kind of dialogues that they can feel confident have most educational value.}}

	{{adaptedfrom\|Questioning Research Summary\|Body\|~~=Summary of research=~~		=Summary of research=
	'''Effective questioning'''		{{adaptedfrom\|Questioning Research Summary\|Body\|'''Effective questioning'''

	Research evidence suggests that effective teachers use a greater number of open questions than less effective teachers. The mix of open and closed questions will, of course, depend on what is being taught and the objectives of the lesson. However, teachers who ask no open questions in a lesson may be providing insufficient cognitive challenges for pupils.		Research evidence suggests that effective teachers use a greater number of open questions than less effective teachers. The mix of open and closed questions will, of course, depend on what is being taught and the objectives of the lesson. However, teachers who ask no open questions in a lesson may be providing insufficient cognitive challenges for pupils.

SimonKnight at 11:22, 23 August 2012

2012-08-23T11:22:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:22, 23 August 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:
	A teacher's professional development (and, indeed, the development of members of any profession) should involve the gaining of critical insights into professional practice – to learn to see behind the ordinary, the taken for granted, and to question the effectiveness of what is normally done. Recognizing the inherent structure of teacher-pupil talk is a valuable step in that direction. Student teachers need to see how they almost inevitably converge on other teachers' style and generate the conventional patterns of classroom talk. By noting this, they can begin to consider what effects this has on pupil participation in class. There is nothing wrong with the use of IRFs by teachers, but question-and-answer routines can be used both productively and unproductively. By understanding and questioning what generally happens, students can begin to construct the kind of dialogues that they can feel confident have most educational value.}}		A teacher's professional development (and, indeed, the development of members of any profession) should involve the gaining of critical insights into professional practice – to learn to see behind the ordinary, the taken for granted, and to question the effectiveness of what is normally done. Recognizing the inherent structure of teacher-pupil talk is a valuable step in that direction. Student teachers need to see how they almost inevitably converge on other teachers' style and generate the conventional patterns of classroom talk. By noting this, they can begin to consider what effects this has on pupil participation in class. There is nothing wrong with the use of IRFs by teachers, but question-and-answer routines can be used both productively and unproductively. By understanding and questioning what generally happens, students can begin to construct the kind of dialogues that they can feel confident have most educational value.}}

	{{adaptedfrom\|Questioning Research Summary\|\|=Summary of research=		{{adaptedfrom\|Questioning Research Summary\|Body\|=Summary of research=
	'''Effective questioning'''		'''Effective questioning'''

SimonKnight at 11:21, 23 August 2012

2012-08-23T11:21:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:21, 23 August 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:
	A teacher's professional development (and, indeed, the development of members of any profession) should involve the gaining of critical insights into professional practice – to learn to see behind the ordinary, the taken for granted, and to question the effectiveness of what is normally done. Recognizing the inherent structure of teacher-pupil talk is a valuable step in that direction. Student teachers need to see how they almost inevitably converge on other teachers' style and generate the conventional patterns of classroom talk. By noting this, they can begin to consider what effects this has on pupil participation in class. There is nothing wrong with the use of IRFs by teachers, but question-and-answer routines can be used both productively and unproductively. By understanding and questioning what generally happens, students can begin to construct the kind of dialogues that they can feel confident have most educational value.}}		A teacher's professional development (and, indeed, the development of members of any profession) should involve the gaining of critical insights into professional practice – to learn to see behind the ordinary, the taken for granted, and to question the effectiveness of what is normally done. Recognizing the inherent structure of teacher-pupil talk is a valuable step in that direction. Student teachers need to see how they almost inevitably converge on other teachers' style and generate the conventional patterns of classroom talk. By noting this, they can begin to consider what effects this has on pupil participation in class. There is nothing wrong with the use of IRFs by teachers, but question-and-answer routines can be used both productively and unproductively. By understanding and questioning what generally happens, students can begin to construct the kind of dialogues that they can feel confident have most educational value.}}

	{{adaptedfrom\|Questioning Research Summary\|\|		{{adaptedfrom\|Questioning Research Summary\|\|=Summary of research=
	=Summary of research=
	'''Effective questioning'''		'''Effective questioning'''

SimonKnight at 11:20, 23 August 2012

2012-08-23T11:20:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:20, 23 August 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:
	A teacher's professional development (and, indeed, the development of members of any profession) should involve the gaining of critical insights into professional practice – to learn to see behind the ordinary, the taken for granted, and to question the effectiveness of what is normally done. Recognizing the inherent structure of teacher-pupil talk is a valuable step in that direction. Student teachers need to see how they almost inevitably converge on other teachers' style and generate the conventional patterns of classroom talk. By noting this, they can begin to consider what effects this has on pupil participation in class. There is nothing wrong with the use of IRFs by teachers, but question-and-answer routines can be used both productively and unproductively. By understanding and questioning what generally happens, students can begin to construct the kind of dialogues that they can feel confident have most educational value.}}		A teacher's professional development (and, indeed, the development of members of any profession) should involve the gaining of critical insights into professional practice – to learn to see behind the ordinary, the taken for granted, and to question the effectiveness of what is normally done. Recognizing the inherent structure of teacher-pupil talk is a valuable step in that direction. Student teachers need to see how they almost inevitably converge on other teachers' style and generate the conventional patterns of classroom talk. By noting this, they can begin to consider what effects this has on pupil participation in class. There is nothing wrong with the use of IRFs by teachers, but question-and-answer routines can be used both productively and unproductively. By understanding and questioning what generally happens, students can begin to construct the kind of dialogues that they can feel confident have most educational value.}}

	~~== Group Talk - a Method for Assessment? ==~~		{{adaptedfrom\|Questioning Research Summary\|\|
	{{adaptedfrom\|~~Group Talk - Benefits for Science Teaching~~\|~~Why~~\|'''~~Why do it? What are the benefits to the learner?~~'''		=Summary of research=
			'''Effective questioning'''

	*'''Higher-level thinking '''Pupils are challenged to defend, ~~review~~ and ~~modify their ideas with their peers~~. ~~It encourages reflection and metacognition (thinking about one’s own thinking). Pupils often communicate ideas better with other~~ pupils ~~than with teachers~~.		Research evidence suggests that effective teachers use a greater number of open questions than less effective teachers. The mix of open and closed questions will, of course, depend on what is being taught and the objectives of the lesson. However, teachers who ask no open questions in a lesson may be providing insufficient cognitive challenges for pupils.

	*'''Assessment for learning ~~'''Effectively reveals the progress~~ of the ~~pupil to the teacher, encouraging the pupil to self-~~ and ~~peer-assess while allowing the teacher to plan more effectively. As such, group talk complements methods embraced as ''Assessment for~~ learning''.		Questioning is one of the most extensively researched areas of teaching and learning. This is because of its central importance in the teaching and learning process. The research falls into three broad categories
			* What is effective questioning?
			* How do questions engage pupils and promote responses?
			* How do questions develop pupils’ cognitive abilities?

	*'''~~Illustrating science in action~~ '''~~Working scientists use group talk – in class it models how they work, supporting the teaching of the ‘ideas and evidence’ aspects of scientific enquiry.~~		'''What is effective questioning?'''

	* ~~'''Developing~~ the ~~whole child '''~~The ~~ability~~ to ~~resolve disagreements~~ is ~~a life-skill~~.		Questioning is effective when it allows pupils to engage with the learning process by actively composing responses. Research (Borich 1996; Muijs and Reynolds 2001; Morgan and Saxton 1994; Wragg and Brown 2001) suggests that lessons where questioning is effective are likely to have the following characteristics
			* Questions are planned and closely linked to the objectives of the lesson.
			*The learning of basic skills is enhanced by frequent questions following the exposition of new content that has been broken down into small steps. Each step should be followed by guided practice that provides opportunities for pupils to consolidate what they have learned and that allows teachers to check understanding.
			* Closed questions are used to check factual understanding and recall.
			* Open questions predominate.
			* Sequences of questions are planned so that the cognitive level increases as the questions go on. This ensures that pupils are led to answer questions which demand increasingly higher-order thinking skills but are supported on the way by questions which require less sophisticated thinking skills.
			* Pupils have opportunities to ask their own questions and seek their own answers. They are encouraged to provide feedback to each other.
			* The classroom climate is one where pupils feel secure enough to take risks, be tentative and make mistakes.

	~~Pupils become more reflective as they try~~ to ~~arrive at~~ a ~~consensus by expressing different points of view; or work collaboratively to explore ideas~~, ~~plan~~ and ~~make decisions~~. ~~Further~~, ~~it supports~~ the ~~development of literacy.~~		The research emphasises the importance of using open, higher-level questions to develop pupils’ higher-order thinking skills. Clearly there needs to be a balance between open and closed questions, depending on the topic and objectives for the lesson. A closed question, such as ‘What is the next number in the sequence?’, can be extended by a follow-up question, such as ‘How did you work that out?’

	*'''Pupil motivation and ~~emotional involvement '''When argument is taking place~~, and ~~pupils~~ are ~~actively prompted~~ and ~~provoked to defend a point~~ of ~~view – by the teacher and by others – it raises the emotional involvement in~~ a ~~topic~~, ~~so that~~ pupils ~~are more engaged. In essence~~, ~~they are being encouraged to ‘care’ about the science viewpoint they have~~, ~~and to take a stand for~~ or ~~against it, even if they concede to others along the way~~. ~~These features are more common in good English~~, ~~RE and humanities lessons~~.		Overall, the research shows that effective teachers use a greater number of higher- order questions and open questions than less effective teachers. However, the research also demonstrates that most of the questions asked by both effective and less effective teachers are lower order and closed. It is estimated that 70–80 per cent of all learning-focused questions require a simple factual response, whereas only 20–30 per cent lead pupils to explain, clarify, expand, generalise or infer. In other words, only a minority of questions demand that pupils use higher-order thinking skills.

	*'''~~Variety~~ and ~~learning styles~~ '''~~Can~~ be used ~~as an alternative~~ to ~~written~~ or ~~practical work~~ (for ~~example~~, ~~experiments~~), ~~or just listening as the teacher explains~~ and ~~demonstrates~~. ~~Group talk encourages the~~ use of ~~different~~ learning ~~styles~~ and ~~thus can~~ be ~~inclusive~~ to ~~pupils excluded from more traditional (~~and ~~often written) activities~~.}}		'''How do questions engage pupils and promote responses?'''

			It doesn’t matter how good and well structured your questions are if your pupils do not respond. This can be a problem with shy pupils or older pupils who are not used to highly interactive teaching. It can also be a problem with pupils who are not very interested in school or engaged with learning. The research identifies a number of strategies which are helpful in encouraging pupil response. (See Borich 1996; Muijs and Reynolds 2001; Morgan and Saxton 1994; Wragg and Brown 2001; Rowe 1986; Black and Harrison 2001; Black et al. 2002.)

			Pupil response is enhanced where
			* there is a classroom climate in which pupils feel safe and know they will not be criticised or ridiculed if they give a wrong answer;
			* prompts are provided to give pupils confidence to try an answer;
			* there is a ‘no-hands’ approach to answering, where you choose the respondent rather than have them volunteer;
			* ‘wait time’ is provided before an answer is required. The research suggests that 3 seconds is about right for most questions, with the proviso that more complex questions may need a longer wait time. Research shows that the average wait time in classrooms is about 1 second (Rowe 1986; Borich 1996).

			'''How do questions develop pupils’ cognitive abilities?'''

			Lower-level questions usually demand factual, descriptive answers that are relatively easy to give. Higher-level questions require more sophisticated thinking from pupils; they are more complex and more difficult to answer. Higher-level questions are central to pupils’ cognitive development, and research evidence suggests that pupils’ levels of achievement can be increased by regular access to higher-order thinking. (See Borich 1996; Muijs and Reynolds 2001; Morgan and Saxton 1994; Wragg and Brown 2001; Black and Harrison 2001.)

			When you are planning higher-level questions, you will find it useful to use Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Bloom and Krathwohl 1956) to help structure questions which will require higher-level thinking. Bloom’s taxonomy is a classification of levels of intellectual behaviour important in learning. The taxonomy classifies cognitive learning into six levels of complexity and abstraction
			# Knowledge – pupils should: describe; identify; recall.
			# Comprehension – pupils should: translate; review; report; restate.
			# Application – pupils should: interpret; predict; show how; solve; try in a new context.
			# Analysis – pupils should: explain; infer; analyse; question; test; criticise.
			# Synthesis – pupils should: design; create; arrange; organise; construct.
			# Evaluation – pupils should: assess; compare and contrast; appraise; argue; select.

			On this scale, knowledge is the lowest-order thinking skill and evaluation is the highest. It is worth pointing out that, in most cases, pupils will need to be able to analyse, synthesise and evaluate if they are to attain level 5 and above in the National Curriculum and Grade C and above at GCSE.

			Bloom researched thousands of questions routinely asked by teachers and categorised them. His research, and that of others, suggests that most learning- focused questions asked in classrooms fall into the first two categories, with few questions falling into the other categories which relate to higher-order thinking skills.}}

SimonKnight: Created page with "== A Common Classroom Sequence == {{adaptedfrom|The Importance of Speaking and Listening|IRF|A striking insight provided by classroom research is that much talk between teache..."

2012-08-23T10:28:04Z

Created page with "== A Common Classroom Sequence == {{adaptedfrom|The Importance of Speaking and Listening|IRF|A striking insight provided by classroom research is that much talk between teache..."

New page

== A Common Classroom Sequence ==
{{adaptedfrom|The Importance of Speaking and Listening|IRF|A striking insight provided by classroom research is that much talk between teachers and their pupils has the following pattern: a teacher's question, a pupil's response, and then an evaluative comment by the teacher. This is described as an Initiation-Response-Feedback exchange, or IRF. Here's an example<br />

:'''I''' Teacher - What's the capital city of Argentina?
:'''R''' Pupil - Buenos Aires
:'''F''' Teacher - Yes, well done

This pattern was first pointed out in the 1970s by the British researchers Sinclair and Coulthard. Their original research was reported in
:Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, M. (1975) ''Towards an Analysis of Discourse: the English used by Teachers and Pupils.'' London: Oxford University Press.

Sinclair and Coulthard's research has been the basis for extended debates about whether or not teachers should ask so many questions to which they already know the answer; and further debate about the range of uses and purposes of IRF in working classrooms. Despite all this, it seems that many teachers (even those who have qualified in recent decades) have not heard of it. Is this because their training did not include any examination of the structures of classroom talk – or because even if it did, the practical value of such an examination was not made clear?

A teacher's professional development (and, indeed, the development of members of any profession) should involve the gaining of critical insights into professional practice – to learn to see behind the ordinary, the taken for granted, and to question the effectiveness of what is normally done. Recognizing the inherent structure of teacher-pupil talk is a valuable step in that direction. Student teachers need to see how they almost inevitably converge on other teachers' style and generate the conventional patterns of classroom talk. By noting this, they can begin to consider what effects this has on pupil participation in class. There is nothing wrong with the use of IRFs by teachers, but question-and-answer routines can be used both productively and unproductively. By understanding and questioning what generally happens, students can begin to construct the kind of dialogues that they can feel confident have most educational value.}}

== Group Talk - a Method for Assessment? ==
{{adaptedfrom|Group Talk - Benefits for Science Teaching|Why|'''Why do it? What are the benefits to the learner?'''

*'''Higher-level thinking '''Pupils are challenged to defend, review and modify their ideas with their peers. It encourages reflection and metacognition (thinking about one’s own thinking). Pupils often communicate ideas better with other pupils than with teachers.

*'''Assessment for learning '''Effectively reveals the progress of the pupil to the teacher, encouraging the pupil to self- and peer-assess while allowing the teacher to plan more effectively. As such, group talk complements methods embraced as ''Assessment for learning''.

*'''Illustrating science in action '''Working scientists use group talk – in class it models how they work, supporting the teaching of the ‘ideas and evidence’ aspects of scientific enquiry.

* '''Developing the whole child '''The ability to resolve disagreements is a life-skill.

Pupils become more reflective as they try to arrive at a consensus by expressing different points of view; or work collaboratively to explore ideas, plan and make decisions. Further, it supports the development of literacy.

*'''Pupil motivation and emotional involvement '''When argument is taking place, and pupils are actively prompted and provoked to defend a point of view – by the teacher and by others – it raises the emotional involvement in a topic, so that pupils are more engaged. In essence, they are being encouraged to ‘care’ about the science viewpoint they have, and to take a stand for or against it, even if they concede to others along the way. These features are more common in good English, RE and humanities lessons.

*'''Variety and learning styles '''Can be used as an alternative to written or practical work (for example, experiments), or just listening as the teacher explains and demonstrates. Group talk encourages the use of different learning styles and thus can be inclusive to pupils excluded from more traditional (and often written) activities.}}