2,003
edits
ORBIT/GeoGebra: Difference between revisions
From OER in Education
→Competition Instructions
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* list the learning objectives as bullet points, | * list the learning objectives as bullet points, | ||
* include a short (3-4 sentences) description of the '''underlying pedagogical/teaching approach or rationale''', | * include a short (3-4 sentences) description of the '''underlying pedagogical/teaching approach or rationale''', | ||
* contain a short '''teacher’s note''' (max 250 words) which provide instructions, useful tips and recommendations | * contain a short '''compulsory teacher’s note''' (max 250 words) which provide instructions, useful tips and recommendations (submissions without teachers’ notes will not be reviewed). | ||
For an example of the kind of pedagogical approach and teacher’s notes required, please see the ORBIT resource entitled Consecutive Sums at http://orbit.educ.cam.ac.uk/wiki/Consecutive_sums/Consecutive_sums_activity. | For an example of the kind of pedagogical approach and teacher’s notes required, please see the ORBIT resource entitled Consecutive Sums at http://orbit.educ.cam.ac.uk/wiki/Consecutive_sums/Consecutive_sums_activity. Please note that your notes need not be as long as those, however. | ||
''We’re not expecting whole lesson plans but rather a clear and concise presentation of how to use the activity effectively in class, especially for a teacher not very familiar with the software, where step-by-step instructions regarding navigating the software will be needed.''<br /> | ''We’re not expecting whole lesson plans but rather a clear and concise presentation of how to use the activity effectively in class, especially for a teacher not very familiar with the software, where step-by-step instructions regarding navigating the software will be needed.''<br /> | ||
