12,782
edits
RECOUP/Evaluation: Difference between revisions
From OER in Education
no edit summary
m (27 revisions: Import from manual.recoup.educ.cam.ac.uk) |
No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>{{RECOUP_header|Evaluation}}</noinclude>{{ | <noinclude>{{RECOUP_header|Evaluation}}</noinclude>{{Template:RECOUP/Shortheader|title=Evaluation of the sessions}} | ||
|title=Evaluation of the sessions | |||
}} | |||
Evaluation of a workshop is an invaluable part of the learning process which provides insights for both the facilitators and participants. Evaluation can help achieve a range of different objectives: | Evaluation of a workshop is an invaluable part of the learning process which provides insights for both the facilitators and participants. Evaluation can help achieve a range of different objectives: | ||
| Line 37: | Line 33: | ||
=End of the workshop evaluation= | =End of the workshop evaluation= | ||
In our workshops we tended to use a paper-pencil method for this evaluation. This was particularly useful where it is considered inappropriate or disrespectful to criticize someone in person, even if done constructively. These paper-based evaluations provided participants a degree of anonymity which some found useful. You might find it useful to consider an {{HOA|example of the evaluation form}} we used for these workshops. Another advantage of this method is that it is relatively easy to summarise responses, for example to send to funders (or to feedback to this web-site to help us improve the manual for future use.) | In our workshops we tended to use a paper-pencil method for this evaluation. This was particularly useful where it is considered inappropriate or disrespectful to criticize someone in person, even if done constructively. These paper-based evaluations provided participants a degree of anonymity which some found useful. You might find it useful to consider an {{Template:RECOUP/HOA|example of the evaluation form}} we used for these workshops. Another advantage of this method is that it is relatively easy to summarise responses, for example to send to funders (or to feedback to this web-site to help us improve the manual for future use.) | ||
In addition to the paper-based method we have tried to supplement it with an open group discussion (on the themes identified in the paper-based questionnaire). These discussions cane be conducted by the participants in the absence of the facilitator(s) and one of them takes the responsibility of giving a collective feedback. | In addition to the paper-based method we have tried to supplement it with an open group discussion (on the themes identified in the paper-based questionnaire). These discussions cane be conducted by the participants in the absence of the facilitator(s) and one of them takes the responsibility of giving a collective feedback. | ||
