Talk:RECOUP/Community scoping: Difference between revisions

From OER in Education
m (1 revision: Import and update from manual.recoup.educ.cam.ac.uk, CC BY-NC-SA - RECOUP)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{RECOUP_header|Talk:Community_scoping}}</noinclude>Whoops, I didn't check this before sending another version, but I think it is slightly better. Nonetheless, it deteriorates (as this version does) into a list of topics to be covered. Do either of you think this needs to be sorted out -- beyond the obvious need to do something about how it looks at present?  Roger
<noinclude>{{RECOUP_header|Talk:Community_scoping}}</noinclude>
{{:RECOUP/site/Help/TalkPages}}


oops - roger i think we are trying to edit at the same time!
i hope my latest change didn't undo anything you have just put up. i will try to recover the previous version. I might log off, so that we avoid any other confusions! arathi


seems to be OK! you carry on, I'm logging off very soon. R
== suggested addition ==


I like the way the pages are shaping up, but this Session exemplifies some of the issues of naming: The 'big issue' for this session is the introduction to ethnographic fieldwork, not the Scoping. Some people might not sun a scoping session at all, but rather more would want to know about fieldwork (I'm guessing here). So do we split this into two sessions, each with a memorable name, or reverse the order, or is it OK just to put both items at the head of the page? I think my preference would be to split into two separate pages (in part because the ethnographic introduction is quite large. But both of these need to be clearly linked to the ethnographic exercise and feedback sessions: how do we do that? [[User:Roger|Roger]] 16:03, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
for the community scoping session we could include a reflection on real issues/scenarios that faced researchers in the south (perhaps the recoup team?) for negotiating access with 'gate keepers'. (ie: the limits of written formalities in some contexts; the use of language (ie, 'gate-keeper' is itself not a desirable word in the Indian context; reflections on social hierarchy - researcher positionality when entering poor communities).


== Swapped images - please check that this is correct. ==
[[RECOUP/site/User/Arathi|Arathi]] 17:10, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 
New:
[[Image:Observing the surroundings.jpg|100px|Observing the surroundings]]
[[Image:Familiarising by walking.jpg|100px|familiarising by walking]]
 
OldL
[[Image:Gettingtoknowthecommunity1.jpg|100px|familiarising by walking]]
[[Image:Gettingtoknowthecommunity3.jpg|100px|familiarising by walking]]
<noinclude>{{RECOUP_footer|Talk:Community_scoping}}</noinclude><noinclude>[[Category:RECOUP]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{RECOUP_footer|Talk:Community_scoping}}</noinclude><noinclude>[[Category:RECOUP]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 12:15, 5 February 2015


Please leave your comments on this page. You need to be logged in to leave comments.

Once you are logged in, simply click the '+' button on the talk page menu (between edit and history: {{#icon: Edit Plus History.png|Leave a comment||https://oer.opendeved.net/index.php?title=Talk:RECOUP/Community_scoping&action=edit&section=new}}, and leave your comment. Please make sure you enter a title, and the text of your comment.

At the end of your comment, please sign your contribution: You can do this by typing four ~ in a row (i.e. '~~~') or by using the 'signature button' RECOUP Button sig.png in the edit menu.



suggested addition

for the community scoping session we could include a reflection on real issues/scenarios that faced researchers in the south (perhaps the recoup team?) for negotiating access with 'gate keepers'. (ie: the limits of written formalities in some contexts; the use of language (ie, 'gate-keeper' is itself not a desirable word in the Indian context; reflections on social hierarchy - researcher positionality when entering poor communities).

Arathi 17:10, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


Cc-by-nc-sa-narrow.png Singal, N., and Jeffery, R. (2008). Qualitative Research Skills Workshop: A Facilitator's Reference Manual, http://oer.educ.cam.ac.uk/wiki/RECOUP, Cambridge: RECOUP (Research Consortium on Educational Outcomes and Poverty, http://recoup.educ.cam.ac.uk/). CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. (original page)