Talk:RECOUP/Ethical issues: Difference between revisions

From OER in Education
m (New page: = Issues with this page = Missing items: * Example consent form * SSPSEthicsPolicyAndProceduresMay08.pdf --~~~~)
 
m (1 revision: Import and update from manual.recoup.educ.cam.ac.uk, CC BY-NC-SA - RECOUP)
 
(18 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{RECOUP_header|Talk:Ethical_issues}}</noinclude>= Issues with this page =
<noinclude>{{RECOUP_header|Talk:Ethical_issues}}</noinclude>
{{:RECOUP/site/Help/TalkPages}}


Missing items:
'''Giving back to the community from which research has been extracted'''
* Example consent form
 
* SSPSEthicsPolicyAndProceduresMay08.pdf
\our researchers have been troubled by this issue ever since the beginning of the \RECOUP research programme. This is particularly because for qualitative research we have to return again and again to the same community.  Some kind of relationship gets built up and the community, disadvantaged as it is compared to your relative affluence, definitely has expectations.  \one of our partners has used food coupons for really poor households.  \Would love to know how others have diealt with this dilemma.  \has anyone tried to build it into the research budget.  \how does it affect research effort in the future?--[[User:Clairen|Clairen]] 11:40, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
--[[User:Bjoern|Bjoern]] 20:23, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 
==suggested additions==
 
as Clairen has mentioned above, there is much scope and need in this section to reflect on research relationships in poor communities (and indeed in all manners of social hierarchy, even in affluent communities). Perhaps a boxed reflection in the main text to encourage more dialogue on the issues involved. Are there examples from Recoup Team's journals/ field diaries that could be use for these, and other suggested 'boxed reflections'? Examples from southern researchers' work on this.
 
[[RECOUP/site/User/Arathi|Arathi]] 17:42, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
<noinclude>{{RECOUP_footer|Talk:Ethical_issues}}</noinclude><noinclude>[[Category:RECOUP]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{RECOUP_footer|Talk:Ethical_issues}}</noinclude><noinclude>[[Category:RECOUP]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 12:15, 5 February 2015


Please leave your comments on this page. You need to be logged in to leave comments.

Once you are logged in, simply click the '+' button on the talk page menu (between edit and history: {{#icon: Edit Plus History.png|Leave a comment||https://oer.opendeved.net/index.php?title=Talk:RECOUP/Ethical_issues&action=edit&section=new}}, and leave your comment. Please make sure you enter a title, and the text of your comment.

At the end of your comment, please sign your contribution: You can do this by typing four ~ in a row (i.e. '~~~') or by using the 'signature button' RECOUP Button sig.png in the edit menu.


Giving back to the community from which research has been extracted

\our researchers have been troubled by this issue ever since the beginning of the \RECOUP research programme. This is particularly because for qualitative research we have to return again and again to the same community. Some kind of relationship gets built up and the community, disadvantaged as it is compared to your relative affluence, definitely has expectations. \one of our partners has used food coupons for really poor households. \Would love to know how others have diealt with this dilemma. \has anyone tried to build it into the research budget. \how does it affect research effort in the future?--Clairen 11:40, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

suggested additions

as Clairen has mentioned above, there is much scope and need in this section to reflect on research relationships in poor communities (and indeed in all manners of social hierarchy, even in affluent communities). Perhaps a boxed reflection in the main text to encourage more dialogue on the issues involved. Are there examples from Recoup Team's journals/ field diaries that could be use for these, and other suggested 'boxed reflections'? Examples from southern researchers' work on this.

Arathi 17:42, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


Cc-by-nc-sa-narrow.png Singal, N., and Jeffery, R. (2008). Qualitative Research Skills Workshop: A Facilitator's Reference Manual, http://oer.educ.cam.ac.uk/wiki/RECOUP, Cambridge: RECOUP (Research Consortium on Educational Outcomes and Poverty, http://recoup.educ.cam.ac.uk/). CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. (original page)