RECOUP/Evaluation/example of the evaluation form/handout: Difference between revisions
m (Transfer from RECOUP, real timestamp = 2008-09-20T20:47:02Z.New page: <center>'''EVALUATION OF THE WORKSHOP'''</center> '''IN YOUR VIEW, WHAT WAS THE BEST THING ABOUT THE WORKSHOP?''' '''II) WHAT ARE YOUR SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT?''' '''III) PLEA) |
m (1 revision: Import and update from manual.recoup.educ.cam.ac.uk, CC BY-NC-SA - RECOUP) |
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 12:20, 5 February 2015
IN YOUR VIEW, WHAT WAS THE BEST THING ABOUT THE WORKSHOP?
II) WHAT ARE YOUR SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT?
III) PLEASE RATE THE STRUCTURE OF THE WORKSHOP
| |||||
| Timings | |||||
| Lay out of the day |
Additional comments:
IV) PLEASE RATE THE CONTENT OF THE WORKSHOP
| |||||
| How relevant was the workshop to your needs? | |||||
| Were the presentations accessible? | |||||
| Were the discussions in the sessions useful? | |||||
| Did we cover enough topics? | |||||
| Did we cover research issues in enough depth? |
Additional comments:
PLEASE RATE THE STYLE OF THE WORKSHOP
| |||||
| Did you feel that you had enough opportunities to participate?
|
|||||
| Were the handouts useful?
|
|||||
| Who would you rate the quality of the facilitators(s)?
|
Additional comments:
PLEASE NOTE THE THREE MOST IMPORTANT THINGS THAT YOU HAVE LEARNT IN THIS WORKSHOP
IS THERE ANY FURTHER TRAINING THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO HAVE AFTER THIS WORKSHOP? IF SO, PLEASE SPECIFY WHICH ASPECTS OU WOULD LIKE IT TO ADDRESS:
PLEASE PROVIDE ANY FURTHER COMMENTS THAT YOU MIGHT WISH TO ADD:
Singal, N., and Jeffery, R. (2008). Qualitative Research Skills Workshop: A Facilitator's Reference Manual, http://oer.educ.cam.ac.uk/wiki/RECOUP, Cambridge: RECOUP (Research Consortium on Educational Outcomes and Poverty, http://recoup.educ.cam.ac.uk/). CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. (original page)
