Which material makes a good parachute/teaching approach: Difference between revisions

From OER in Education
No edit summary
(added category tags)
Line 1: Line 1:
   
   
This activity supports a number of learning types:
This activity supports a number of learning types:
:
 
*Small {{tag|group work}} - Investigation conducted by small groups reporting back to the class           
*Small {{tag|group work}} - Investigation conducted by small groups reporting back to the class           
*{{tag|Whole class}} {{tag|dialogue}}  - Discussion of each situation Open-ended {{tag|questions}} – Why did this happen?  What do you think causes this movement?  
*{{tag|Whole class}} {{tag|dialogue}}  - Discussion of each situation Open-ended {{tag|questions}} – Why did this happen?  What do you think causes this movement?  

Revision as of 08:58, 19 September 2012

This activity supports a number of learning types:

  • Small group work(i) - Investigation conducted by small groups reporting back to the class
  • Whole class(i) dialogue(i) - Discussion of each situation Open-ended questions(i) – Why did this happen? What do you think causes this movement?
  • Peer assessment(i) – do peers agree?
  • Project work – linked in with the rest of the activities in this OER, topic work in design and technology, literacy, numeracy
  • Inquiry(i)-based learning – initial presentation to the class can be framed as a problem for them to solve.Co-enquiry – children working collaboratively
  • Arguing and reasoning(i) – persuading each other about their explanations
  • Exploring ideas – developing understanding of key scientific principles