Which material makes a good parachute/teaching approach: Difference between revisions

From OER in Education
m (Fixing tagging, as well as cross-curric, vocabulary, distance learning, share practice, DfE, DfEScience templates)
No edit summary
 
Line 3: Line 3:


*small {{teachtag|group work}} - investigation conducted by small groups reporting back to the class.           
*small {{teachtag|group work}} - investigation conducted by small groups reporting back to the class.           
*{{teachtag|whole class}} {{teachtag|dialogue}} - discussion of each situation open-ended {{teachtag|questions}} – why did this happen?  what do you think causes this movement?  
*{{teachtag|whole class}} {{teachtag|dialogue}} - discussion of each situation open-ended {{teachtag|questioning|questions}} – why did this happen?  what do you think causes this movement?  
*peer {{teachtag|assessment}} – do peers agree?
*peer {{teachtag|assessment}} – do peers agree?
*project work – linked in with the rest of the activities in this OER, topic work in design and technology, literacy, numeracy
*project work – linked in with the rest of the activities in this OER, topic work in design and technology, literacy, numeracy

Latest revision as of 12:33, 28 September 2012

This activity supports a number of learning types:

  • small group work(ta) - investigation conducted by small groups reporting back to the class.
  • whole class(ta) dialogue(ta) - discussion of each situation open-ended questions(ta) – why did this happen? what do you think causes this movement?
  • peer assessment(ta) – do peers agree?
  • project work – linked in with the rest of the activities in this OER, topic work in design and technology, literacy, numeracy
  • inquiry(ta)-based learning – initial presentation to the class can be framed as a problem for them to solve; co-enquiry – children working collaboratively
  • arguing and reasoning(ta) – persuading each other about their explanations.
  • exploring ideas – developing understanding of key scientific principles.