Recreating the Big Bang/teaching approach: Difference between revisions

From OER in Education
(Created page with "Session 4 takes a tour of CERN and tries to explain why it is worth spending so much money on one experiment. It then delves deeply into particle physics, looking at sub atomi...")
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Session 4 takes a tour of CERN and tries to explain why it is worth spending so much money on one experiment. It then delves deeply into particle physics, looking at sub atomic particles and trying to give understandable analogies as to what these particles are and do. This session and session 5 are together the most complex theoretically and present most challenges to young peoples world views, and as such are often led as much by their {{tag|questions}} as by the scripted presentation.  The session is thus often focussed on {{tag|whole class}} {{tag|dialogue}} and {{tag|higher order}} thinking skills as well as exploring scientific {{tag|language}}
This presentation  takes a tour of CERN and tries to explain why it is worth spending so much money on one experiment. It then delves into particle physics, looking at sub-atomic particles to offer analogies for what these particles are.  The session focuses on {{tag|whole class}} {{tag|dialogue}} and {{tag|higher order}} thinking skills as well as exploring scientific {{tag|language}}. This 4th session and the next are together the most theoretically complex and they present challenges to young peoples world views. As such they are led as much by their {{tag|questions}} as by the presentation.

Revision as of 15:41, 10 September 2012

This presentation takes a tour of CERN and tries to explain why it is worth spending so much money on one experiment. It then delves into particle physics, looking at sub-atomic particles to offer analogies for what these particles are. The session focuses on whole class(i) dialogue(i) and higher order(i) thinking skills as well as exploring scientific language(i). This 4th session and the next are together the most theoretically complex and they present challenges to young peoples world views. As such they are led as much by their questions(i) as by the presentation.