Building Capacity in School: Difference between revisions
From OER in Education
SimonKnight (talk | contribs) (Created page with "=Building capacity in school= The table below explains the characteristics of a school or department with a well-developed capacity for improvement in teaching and learning a...") |
SimonKnight (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{:Building Capacity in School/Table}} | {{:Building Capacity in School/Table}} | ||
<hr> | |||
{{DfE}} |
Revision as of 15:10, 24 August 2012
Building capacity in school
The table below explains the characteristics of a school or department with a well-developed capacity for improvement in teaching and learning approaches.
Attribute | Examples at whole-school level | Examples at department level | How are you doing? |
It routinely shares its expertise | Staff meetings regularly feature teachers demonstrating or illustrating how they teach | Collaborative planning involves teachers sharing their ideas on how work can be delivered. The department shares demonstration lessons with staff | |
It uses external support and challenge to enhance practice | Teachers are regularly encouraged to attend external INSET. LEA school advisers are drawn in to contribute to school self-review processes | The department uses the LEA KS3 consultants to observe lessons and provide feedback | |
It has a clear, operational focus | The SMT signals clearly that certain items in meetings are significant in improving teaching and learning and ensures they are given significantly more time | Meetings are focused on teaching and
learning issues. The team is clear about which items require only a little time. Administrative items are given later slots in meetings |
|
It has a well- developed set of priorities | It has a clear and operational (not cosmetic) development plan which guides resource decisions and action taken | The department has an action plan based firmly on an audit of teaching strengths and weaknesses. Resource decisions are based on declared priorities
of strengths and weaknesses |
|
It elevates professional development to a continual process | Individual teachers are enabled to watch colleagues teach on a regular and systematic basis | An audit of each team member’s skills is used as a basis for termly review discussions and lesson observations |
- This resource is part of the DfES resource "Pedagogy and practice: Teaching and learning in secondary schools" (ref: 0423-2004G) which can be downloaded from the National Archives http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110809101133/nsonline.org.uk/node/97131 The whole resource (512 pages) can be downloaded as a pdf File:Pedagogy and Practice DfES.pdf
- The resource booklets, and many 'harvested' documents are available to download, generally in editable formats from the ORBIT resources http://orbit.educ.cam.ac.uk/wiki/Category:DfE
- The videos from the accompanying DVDs are available http://orbit.educ.cam.ac.uk/wiki/DfES_DVD