|
|
| Line 27: |
Line 27: |
| }} | | }} |
|
| |
|
| PLEASE ADD REVIEW OF FOLLOW-UP HEADER HERE WHEN A NEW PAGE HAS BEEN CREATED
| | = {{name for review of follow up}} = |
|
| |
|
| {{activity|Small group activity|20}} Get into your small group of last week’s ‘making use of enquiry ideas A-E’ activity to discuss your homework tasks. | | {{review of follow up}} |
| | |
| '''Part A:''' (5 mins) You were asked to try out a mini-GeoGebra enquiry lesson in your class. Discuss in your small groups the following questions:
| |
| | |
| *How did your students respond to the open nature of this task?
| |
| *Did you feel confident with teaching using GeoGebra? Why or why not?
| |
| *What other observations can you make that will help you evaluate the use of Geogebra?
| |
| | |
| '''Part B:''' (15 mins) Invite colleagues to share how their extended enquiry-based learning (EBL) lessons are going. They could do this by giving PMIs of '''at least two''' of the following considerations of a successful EBL lesson:
| |
| * Nature of enquiry tasks (e.g. are they open-ended enough so that students could also take some responsibility to research and find ways to investigate different enquiry ideas, rather than just producing an answer or a solution?).
| |
| * Students’ involvement in framing enquiry tasks and questions (e.g. can you persuade students to ask more questions without feeling shy or stupid?).
| |
| * Students’ engagement and competence in conducting an experiment, searching for information or resources themselves.
| |
| * Students’ engagement and competence in interpreting the information or data themselves.
| |
| * Teacher’s role as a guide and co-learner with the students.
| |
| * Availability and accessibility of resources (e.g. internet).
| |
|
| |
|
| =More on making predictions= | | =More on making predictions= |
