Anonymous

EWTE/nav/plusminus: Difference between revisions

From OER in Education
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The advantages of this approach are:
The advantages of this approach are:
* Flexible creation of navigation, as simple as adding a generic template ([[Template:BasePageGroupNav]]) to each in a set of pages (and sub-pages) to create navigation.
* Flexible creation of navigation, as simple as adding a generic template ([[Template:BasePageGroupNav]]) to each in a set of pages (and sub-pages) to create navigation.
* Allows for 'previous' and 'next' links.
* The page itself 'knows' that it's part of the book (and where it is in the book), and can 'behave' accordingly, e.g. allowing for 'previous' and 'next' links.
* The page itself 'knows' that it's part of the book, and can 'behave' accordingly.
The disadvantages of this approach are:
The disadvantages of this approach are:
* It does require a number of extensions to be installed (semantic mediawiki, as well as functions for arrays).
* It does require a number of extensions to be installed (semantic mediawiki, as well as functions for arrays).
* It does not integrate with the book extension, when in principle the functionality is similar.
* It does not integrate with the book extension, when in principle the functionality is similar.