12,782
edits
RECOUP/Overview: Difference between revisions
From OER in Education
no edit summary
m (1 revision: Import and update from manual.recoup.educ.cam.ac.uk, CC BY-NC-SA - RECOUP) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>{{RECOUP_header|Overview}}</noinclude> | <noinclude>{{RECOUP_header|Overview}}</noinclude>{{Template:RECOUP/Shortheader|title=Overview of the workshop}} | ||
{{Template:RECOUP/Shortheader|title=Overview of the workshop | |||
}} | |||
== Basics == | == Basics == | ||
This manual has been designed to help facilitators run workshops with small groups (between 10 and 16 participants). We think this size is ideal: it is not so small that there's no opportunity for mutual learning, nor so large that it is hard for every participant to make contributions to discussions. In addition, in some sessions (Semi-structured interviews, Ethnographic fieldwork, for example) facilitators should give individual feedback to participants, for example on interviewing styles and on fieldnote writing styles. This means that there should be at least two facilitators who are familiar with the whole course (though they do not necessarily have to attend every session). In our experience, we found the presence of three or four facilitators was better than relying on only two. | This manual has been designed to help facilitators run workshops with small groups (between 10 and 16 participants). We think this size is ideal: it is not so small that there's no opportunity for mutual learning, nor so large that it is hard for every participant to make contributions to discussions. In addition, in some sessions (Semi-structured interviews, Ethnographic fieldwork, for example) facilitators should give individual feedback to participants, for example on interviewing styles and on fieldnote writing styles. This means that there should be at least two facilitators who are familiar with the whole course (though they do not necessarily have to attend every session). In our experience, we found the presence of three or four facilitators was better than relying on only two. | ||
