2,188
edits
JanetBlair (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
JanetBlair (talk | contribs) (Rejigged the PMI activity following feedback from Abel) |
||
| Line 230: | Line 230: | ||
Students worked on their own to derive a general formula. Teacher asked students to present their findings at the end of their investigation – which may span across two or three days. | Students worked on their own to derive a general formula. Teacher asked students to present their findings at the end of their investigation – which may span across two or three days. | ||
{{Activity|Small Group | {{Activity|Small Group Activity}} Before having a brief discussion on the differences of the levels of enquiry, it may be helpful to do a PMI (positives, minuses, interesting) activity where you work in groups of two or three and consider the PMIs of each approach. Remember, you can also use a PMI activity to consider the possible pros and cons of a random statement as in the ‘Plants can now walk in our World!’ statement in 5.1. | ||
Do a PMI activity | Do a PMI activity and come up with something '''P'''ositive about and a '''M'''inus point about as well as something '''I'''nteresting about, in this case, the enquiry levels/approaches used by Teachers A, B, C and D and/or consider the following questions for discussion: | ||
# What do you think are the main differences between the levels of enquiry? | |||
# Where do you see yourself (Teacher A-D?) in terms of conducting an enquiry-based learning activity in your class if you were to teach them today? Why do you say that? | |||
# Do you think there is a possibility that you will consider using a different approach to start an enquiry-based lesson in your class if you are given some time to plan? What and how will you go about trying? | |||
Here is one way of organising | {{ednote|text=Here is one way of organising the PMI activity so that all groups consider all 4 levels of enquiry - as represented by Teachers A to D: | ||
* Place a piece of A4 paper with the title: ‘'''Teacher A: Demonstrated Enquiry'''’ on a desk (desk A) in one corner of the room. | * Place a piece of A4 paper with the title: ‘'''Teacher A: Demonstrated Enquiry'''’ on a desk (desk A) in one corner of the room. | ||
* Then place a second piece of paper with the title: ‘'''Teacher B: Structured Enquiry'''‘ on a desk (desk B) in another corner of the room. | * Then place a second piece of paper with the title: ‘'''Teacher B: Structured Enquiry'''‘ on a desk (desk B) in another corner of the room. | ||
| Line 243: | Line 246: | ||
* Each group starts on a different desk. They will read through the enquiry approach for that Teacher, have a short discussion about the PMI’s of the Teacher/enquiry approach and write them down before moving on to the next desk in the A,B,C,D sequence (so A moves to B, B moves to C etc.). | * Each group starts on a different desk. They will read through the enquiry approach for that Teacher, have a short discussion about the PMI’s of the Teacher/enquiry approach and write them down before moving on to the next desk in the A,B,C,D sequence (so A moves to B, B moves to C etc.). | ||
After the first move, there will already be something positive ('''P'''), something negative ('''M''') and an interesting point ('''I''') written on the paper now in front of each group. If there are only three groups, the group starting at desk C and moving on to desk D will be greeted with another blank piece of paper Each group will read through the enquiry approach for that Teacher but they will have to think more deeply about ''their'' PMIs, moving beyond the obvious (so, they should not repeat what has been written but should extend their thinking, perhaps using those ideas). The third group to arrive at that desk will hopefully be able to use the other groups ideas to delve even deeper. By perpetuating this cycle all groups will get to discuss each of the Teachers with an increasing level of challenge to their thinking. | |||
After the first move, there will already be something positive ('''P'''), something negative ('''M''') and an interesting point ('''I''') written on the paper now in front of each group | |||
At the end of the activity, the four pieces of paper could be displayed so that everyone can see what has been written. Another discussion may arise out of this process, but that’s enquiry for you! | At the end of the activity, the four pieces of paper could be displayed so that everyone can see what has been written. Another discussion may arise out of this process, but that’s enquiry for you! | ||
Another way to do this activity is to move the pieces of A4 paper from group to group. This works well if there are the same number of groups as pieces of paper - | |||
Groups each choose from Teachers A, B, C or D, feedback one PMI related to their choice, and then pass their chosen teacher (piece of paper) on for the next group to consider. The next group must come up with a different PMI for that same Teacher. By the end of the activity each of A, B, C and D should have 4 PMI comments. The feedback comments could be written on the board by the facilitator for ongoing discussion or written on the piece of A4 paper and passed on.}} | |||
Another way to do this activity is to move the pieces of A4 paper from group to group. This works well if there are the same number of groups as pieces of paper | |||
Groups each choose from Teachers A, B, C or D, feedback one PMI related to their choice, and then pass their chosen teacher on for the next group to consider. The next group must come up with a different PMI for that same | |||
There is no single correct way to teach or to conduct an enquiry. Effective teachers are resourceful and have a whole repertoire of teaching strategies which they draw on as appropriate, according to the topic, task, level of student confidence and knowledge. The diagram below shows how levels of teacher support and student independence might vary. | There is no single correct way to teach or to conduct an enquiry. Effective teachers are resourceful and have a whole repertoire of teaching strategies which they draw on as appropriate, according to the topic, task, level of student confidence and knowledge. The diagram below shows how levels of teacher support and student independence might vary. | ||