2,003
edits
Which material makes a good parachute/teaching approach: Difference between revisions
From OER in Education
Which material makes a good parachute/teaching approach (view source)
Revision as of 12:45, 19 September 2012
, 13 years agono edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This activity supports a number of learning types: | This activity supports a number of learning types: | ||
* | *Small {{tag|group work}} - Investigation conducted by small groups reporting back to the class. | ||
*{{tag|Whole class}} {{tag|dialogue}} - discussion of each situation Open-ended {{tag|questions}} – Why did this happen? What do you think causes this movement? | *{{tag|Whole class}} {{tag|dialogue}} - discussion of each situation Open-ended {{tag|questions}} – Why did this happen? What do you think causes this movement? | ||
* | *Peer {{tag|assessment}} – do peers agree? | ||
* | *Project work – linked in with the rest of the activities in this OER, topic work in design and technology, literacy, numeracy. | ||
*{{tag| | *{{tag|Inquiry}}-based learning – initial presentation to the class can be framed as a problem for them to solve.Co-enquiry – children working collaboratively. | ||
* | *Arguing and {{tag|reasoning}} – persuading each other about their explanations. | ||
* | *Exploring ideas – developing understanding of key scientific principles.<br/> | ||
